Radiocarbon dating machine calibration
The method they use to attempt to do so is twisted to fit evolutionary theory. Any regular reader of this magazine should know the answer to this basic question.
The Bible is the foundation and source of all the forecasts in this magazine.
Anything further back and the dates are as much as 800 years off.
So scientists made calibration charts to make up for the variation.
Everyone assumes that dates that follow the word “radiocarbon” are accurate, precise and sure. The basic principle of radiocarbon dating is that plants and animals absorb trace amounts of radioactive carbon-14 from carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere while they are alive but stop doing so when they die.
The carbon-14 in a sample decays at a steady rate after it dies, and thus works like a clock.
Scientists, however, will push the envelope to 10,000 . In 2004, the claimed reliability of radiocarbon dating supposedly got a boost to 26,000 years, and then again in 2010 back to 50,000 years ago—the point at which there is too little carbon-14 to measure accurately.
Scientists now claim 50,000 years is as far back as this method can go.
Intcal extended radiocarbon dates beyond the limit of dendrochronology by basing it on “matched uranium series and radiocarbon dates on fossil corals, coupled with radiocarbon-dated organic material from laminated marine sediments in the Cariaco Basin, Venzuela” (Mike Walker, Quartenary Dating Methods, 2005). They apparently increased the effectiveness of radiocarbon dating by basing their calibration charts on radiocarbon-dated coral and sediment layers!
And what was it that finally got the scientists to agree on their uncertain calibration curve? The problem with all these theories and conclusions is that they hark back to the scientists’ blind belief in the false theory of evolution.
That is about the only thing the scientists agree on, yet it causes much confusion and chaos.
Yet that is the necessity by which these scientists are driven.
They need a way to date artifacts further than 5,000 to 6,000 years ago so they can prove their false theory “true”!
If no dating system is created, evolution will forever be stuck in the realm of hypothesis.